🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts regarding the comments delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's victory over Taylor Fritz in the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is American, Fowler is from the US – and sports often encourage patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment was understandable. Instead, Fowler brought up the ongoing absence of US male players at the majors: none of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the competition.

We all enjoy a narrative, me too. But really. Even if Fritz had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, whom he has yet to beat in an official match. And had he someway survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven major titles (and the Spaniard proceeded to thrash a tired Djokovic in the subsequent match). Fritz said in post-match interviews after the loss that he in fact liked his path, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the top three competitors in the sport back-to-back. He is more than justified to aspire to the achievement; an athlete is supposed to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match what other person in their right mind had the drought of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

The American, 28, is ranked number four in the global rankings starting this week’s year-end championships and has secured his last six encounters over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. It's likely he might claim that position for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that’s as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of ranking points away. His top-class delivery and powerful strength on each forehand and reverse side are sufficiently enough to dispose of the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is frequently helpless. The past few years has witnessed the interesting emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming quickness and grace of smaller players. He is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was dictating, and playing a drop shot against him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a quite harsh restriction on his potential.

The American has made a several dramatic, unexpected improvements over the years. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months after, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly surged up to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and beating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was the commentator thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the ongoing slump of American men lifting major titles when Fritz had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the appreciation for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best advancement to the All England Club last four in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that exact last eight match should have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic won in four sets, a victory that only felt tenuous for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a few championship opportunities and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz creating numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the brink of agony. When he eventually did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly produced a horrendous service game to drop serve again; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and compelled him to expend excessive energy to win it. Facing set points in the final game, his first serve floated to the sky. He prolonged the match twice on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It was not a collapse, I didn’t think, only a result of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The match was quite compelling evidence that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to defeat any form of Djokovic, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and did not especially seem like he believed he could win. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is those who were anticipating the American to prevail, and pressuring him to do so, when he was had not done anything that indicated he could.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in press conferences, exceeding virtually anyone on the ATP aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only express how he feels or the tactic he believed decided a match, but clarify it. That he should bear the brunt of the responsibility for America not produce a male major champion since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can divide that load.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely dwell on it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” Fritz told a journalist in June of claiming a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he does not fulfill that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact extremely unlikely for everybody else. {